Tuesday, January 24, 2006
Democratic strategy for 2006
Thanks to Bitch, Ph.D. for the apparent cold, hard truth.
My kingdom for some extra balls to send to the left side of the aisle.
--ER
My kingdom for some extra balls to send to the left side of the aisle.
--ER
Comments:
<< Home
Love it!
Is this the 21st Century version of "duck and cover"? It may not be such a bad stategy given the options available. Hope the shell protects against radiation.
But I do have to comment, as a Life Long Democrat, I know deep in my soul that the words Democrat and Strategy can not be use in the same sentence much less one modify the other.
Is this the 21st Century version of "duck and cover"? It may not be such a bad stategy given the options available. Hope the shell protects against radiation.
But I do have to comment, as a Life Long Democrat, I know deep in my soul that the words Democrat and Strategy can not be use in the same sentence much less one modify the other.
# posted by 
: 10:47 PM
: 10:47 PM
More honorable, and effective in the long term, to concentrate on finding consensus within the party -- and to have party leaders that have balls to back their rhetoric.
Well, as long as most voting Americans -- or at least enough voting Americans in enough states and congressional districts -- believe homosexual marriage and abortion are wrong, that will be the case.
Which, to me, says something about how the Dems -- my Dems -- might oughta reevaluate their damn priorities. I'm not saying choice and freedom aren't important, and that the concept of marriage shoudn't be broadened. I am saying that can't be the main things the Dems talk about, fuss over and freak out about.
It is ALWAYS the economy, stupid. ALWAYS -- and why we don't blow the GOP off the face of the continent by hammering them on job outsourcing overseas, the nonexistent Southwestern and its big-money ass-kissing of unAmerican multinational corporations is beyond me.
Which, to me, says something about how the Dems -- my Dems -- might oughta reevaluate their damn priorities. I'm not saying choice and freedom aren't important, and that the concept of marriage shoudn't be broadened. I am saying that can't be the main things the Dems talk about, fuss over and freak out about.
It is ALWAYS the economy, stupid. ALWAYS -- and why we don't blow the GOP off the face of the continent by hammering them on job outsourcing overseas, the nonexistent Southwestern and its big-money ass-kissing of unAmerican multinational corporations is beyond me.
I don't think so, MDA. I think the rightr wing cares more about those things. Most people are more concerned about their pocketbooks. And if Dems keep talking about those things, more nonvoters would become voters and would water down the influence of the right's hot-button bulls--t. IMHO.
Post a Comment
<< Home
