Tuesday, January 24, 2006
Democratic strategy for 2006
My kingdom for some extra balls to send to the left side of the aisle.
Is this the 21st Century version of "duck and cover"? It may not be such a bad stategy given the options available. Hope the shell protects against radiation.
But I do have to comment, as a Life Long Democrat, I know deep in my soul that the words Democrat and Strategy can not be use in the same sentence much less one modify the other.
Which, to me, says something about how the Dems -- my Dems -- might oughta reevaluate their damn priorities. I'm not saying choice and freedom aren't important, and that the concept of marriage shoudn't be broadened. I am saying that can't be the main things the Dems talk about, fuss over and freak out about.
It is ALWAYS the economy, stupid. ALWAYS -- and why we don't blow the GOP off the face of the continent by hammering them on job outsourcing overseas, the nonexistent Southwestern and its big-money ass-kissing of unAmerican multinational corporations is beyond me.
I agree with you wholeheartedly. However, the problem still persist: THE VOTING PUBLIC CARES MORE ABOUT REGULATING PERSONAL MOLRALITY THAN IT DOES ABOUT THE ECONOMY AND SOCIAL MORALITY. Sad, yes. True, yes. Sad because it's true, oh Hell yeah.