Tuesday, June 24, 2008
James Dobson sics
James Dobson sics himself on Obama. In "Christian love," of course.
Spin is sin, Dr. Dobson.
Fruitcake capital of the Western world: Colorado Springs, Colo.
--ER
Spin is sin, Dr. Dobson.
Fruitcake capital of the Western world: Colorado Springs, Colo.
--ER
Comments:
<< Home
"I think he's deliberately distorting the traditional understanding of the Bible to fit his own worldview, his own confused theology," Dobson said.
"... He is dragging biblical understanding through the gutter."
Coming from one who knows of which he speaks - from personal experience...
"... He is dragging biblical understanding through the gutter."
Coming from one who knows of which he speaks - from personal experience...
Soooo.... let me get this straight. It's okay that Obama distorts biblical truth because Dobson does? How does that work exactly?
"Biblical truth" is a meaningless term. There are truths in the Bible. We all emphasise those that matter most to us.
Dobson's matter least to me.
How's that?
Dobson's matter least to me.
How's that?
"It's okay that Obama distorts biblical truth because Dobson does? How does that work exactly?"
Yes, that's exactly what we're saying. Feh.
The point, which one would think would be obvious, is that Dobson regularly distorts Biblical truth and should be the last one casting stones, even if Obama does as well (which I'd say he doesn't even come close.)
So obeying the Greatest Commandment is "distorting Biblical truth?" How does that work exactly? ;)
Yes, that's exactly what we're saying. Feh.
The point, which one would think would be obvious, is that Dobson regularly distorts Biblical truth and should be the last one casting stones, even if Obama does as well (which I'd say he doesn't even come close.)
So obeying the Greatest Commandment is "distorting Biblical truth?" How does that work exactly? ;)
I so love ELAshley's "I know you are but what am I?" comment. It's either honestly ignorant or deliberately provocative. Rather than make the obvious point, again and again, why not just let it slide?
I find the concept of "...distorts biblical truth..." somewhat amusing. There must be several hundreds of thousands of books out there extolling "biblical truth" and yet they all have a different slant on what it is. So to invoke the concept of distorting biblical truth is somewhat disconcerting, unless you are the Pope or the yet unrecognized second coming of Christ. But you say, Dobson et. al. have a direct pipeline to God.
Yes, maybe, for their sake I hope he doesn't flush.
Post a Comment
Yes, maybe, for their sake I hope he doesn't flush.
<< Home
