Monday, August 22, 2005
'Downplay America' -- at Ground Zero!
Another insult to America's heritage at Freedom Center
How International Freedom Center risks fostering anti-U.S. sentiment
By DOUGLAS FEIDEN
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER
A global network of human rights museums is urging the International
Freedom Center to downplay America in its exhibits and programs at
Ground Zero, the Daily News has learned.
The outrageous request is the latest controversy to torment the
Freedom Center, whose leaders have tried to dispel the perception
that it would be a home for America bashers.
"Don't feature America first," the IFC has been advised by the
consortium of 14 "museums of conscience" that quietly has been
consulting with the Freedom Center for the past two years over plans
for the hallowed site. "Think internationally, where America is one
of the many nations of the world."
Those words rang hollow with some 9/11 family members.
"I can't think of a greater insult than to invite museums from other
countries of the world to come and exploit what should be America's
memorial," said Jack Lynch, who helped carry the body of his
firefighter son Michael, 30, out of the rubble.
"If you're going to explore slavery, the Holocaust or women's
rights, you should do it at Chelsea Piers or on the East River
waterfront - anywhere but Ground Zero," said Debra Burlingame, whose
brother Charles, 51, was the pilot of the plane that crashed into the
Pentagon.
"After all, it was not slavery that caused the terrorists to attack
us," said Burlingame, who has led the fight to bar the IFC.
Under fire from 9/11 family members and Gov. Pataki, the IFC on July
6 pronounced itself proudly patriotic, vowed never to "blame America"
and said it would celebrate the nation's "leading role in the global
fight for freedom."
In April, however, the Freedom Center said on its Web site and
newsletter that it had "drawn inspiration" and received "important
practical advice" from the International Coalition of Historic Site
Museums of Conscience.
"We have many, many advisers who have given us lots of advice,"
Richard Tofel, Freedom Center president, said last week. "Some of it
we've taken and some of it we haven't - that's the nature of advice."
He said the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia and the
Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington had most inspired the IFC's
vision, and that the new Abraham Lincoln Presidential Museum in
Illinois was also offering extensive advice.
The firefighters union already has demanded the Freedom Center be
booted from Ground Zero, and state officials have given it until
Sept. 23 to satisfy the objections of family members.
Located in nine countries on five continents, the coalition museums
chronicle apartheid in South Africa, slavery in Senegal, torture in
Argentina, racism in the South and internment of Japanese-Americans
in California, along with other historical horrors.
"No one in the civilized world would ever defend what happened on
9/11," said Sarwar Ali, the coalition's chairman and a trustee of the
Liberation War Museum in Bangladesh.
"But what happened after 9/11 - with restrictions placed on human
rights and the cycle of revenge and the allegations of human rights
abuses in prisons - must also be explored," Ali said in a call from
London.
Coalition members gathered for their annual conference at a
Holocaust site in the Czech Republic in July 2004 - and assailed the
United States for "reasserting its power in an arrogant way," the
conference report shows.
Among its suggestions for the place where the United States was
attacked and nearly 3,000 innocents massacred: "The Freedom Center
must signal its openness to contrary ideas."
Philip Kunhardt, the Freedom Center's editorial director, was in
attendance at a session called Bringing Conscience to Ground Zero and
was given this advice:
n "Help distinguish between American people and the U.S. government
in exhibits ..."
n "Use reports from human rights organizations to examine
contemporary abuse of rights."
n "Involve the United Nations, UNESCO and other international
bodies."
n "Use the museum as a venue for international meetings, where all
views are welcomed and considered."
At the conference, the coalition also leveled barbs at the IFC: "The
Freedom Center is a caricature of the typical American response to
everything [telling every story from an American viewpoint]."
Members of the coalition also expressed these concerns:
n "It seems that whatever Americans want, Americans get!" the
conference report states. "Is the definition of the 'struggle for
freedom' simply defined by the victors, or also by those engaged in
ongoing struggles? Will Americans really create a balanced vision of
freedom?"
n "The WTC was attacked because it was a symbol of power and
influence. In building the Freedom Tower, the U.S. reasserts its
power in an arrogant way: Does this mean the U.S. will not only build
the biggest building, but also define freedom for the world?"
n "Many nonsecular Muslims may be very skeptical about the intent of
this museum (e.g. the average Bangladeshi condemns the Sept. 11
attacks, yet at the same time feels his/her human rights have been
violated by the U.S.)."
Kunhardt, an ordained Episcopal minister and the writer of the PBS
series "Freedom: A History of Us," mostly listened. He agreed with
some things that were said, disagreeing with others, an observer
said. He didn't return calls.
Tofel said preliminary plans call for an exchange of exhibits with
some coalition museums.
"It is hoped and expected that temporary exhibits at the IFC will
originate at, or travel to, some of the Historic Site Museums of
Conscience - and perhaps vice versa," he said in an E-mail.
Originally published on August 21, 2005
How International Freedom Center risks fostering anti-U.S. sentiment
By DOUGLAS FEIDEN
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER
A global network of human rights museums is urging the International
Freedom Center to downplay America in its exhibits and programs at
Ground Zero, the Daily News has learned.
The outrageous request is the latest controversy to torment the
Freedom Center, whose leaders have tried to dispel the perception
that it would be a home for America bashers.
"Don't feature America first," the IFC has been advised by the
consortium of 14 "museums of conscience" that quietly has been
consulting with the Freedom Center for the past two years over plans
for the hallowed site. "Think internationally, where America is one
of the many nations of the world."
Those words rang hollow with some 9/11 family members.
"I can't think of a greater insult than to invite museums from other
countries of the world to come and exploit what should be America's
memorial," said Jack Lynch, who helped carry the body of his
firefighter son Michael, 30, out of the rubble.
"If you're going to explore slavery, the Holocaust or women's
rights, you should do it at Chelsea Piers or on the East River
waterfront - anywhere but Ground Zero," said Debra Burlingame, whose
brother Charles, 51, was the pilot of the plane that crashed into the
Pentagon.
"After all, it was not slavery that caused the terrorists to attack
us," said Burlingame, who has led the fight to bar the IFC.
Under fire from 9/11 family members and Gov. Pataki, the IFC on July
6 pronounced itself proudly patriotic, vowed never to "blame America"
and said it would celebrate the nation's "leading role in the global
fight for freedom."
In April, however, the Freedom Center said on its Web site and
newsletter that it had "drawn inspiration" and received "important
practical advice" from the International Coalition of Historic Site
Museums of Conscience.
"We have many, many advisers who have given us lots of advice,"
Richard Tofel, Freedom Center president, said last week. "Some of it
we've taken and some of it we haven't - that's the nature of advice."
He said the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia and the
Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington had most inspired the IFC's
vision, and that the new Abraham Lincoln Presidential Museum in
Illinois was also offering extensive advice.
The firefighters union already has demanded the Freedom Center be
booted from Ground Zero, and state officials have given it until
Sept. 23 to satisfy the objections of family members.
Located in nine countries on five continents, the coalition museums
chronicle apartheid in South Africa, slavery in Senegal, torture in
Argentina, racism in the South and internment of Japanese-Americans
in California, along with other historical horrors.
"No one in the civilized world would ever defend what happened on
9/11," said Sarwar Ali, the coalition's chairman and a trustee of the
Liberation War Museum in Bangladesh.
"But what happened after 9/11 - with restrictions placed on human
rights and the cycle of revenge and the allegations of human rights
abuses in prisons - must also be explored," Ali said in a call from
London.
Coalition members gathered for their annual conference at a
Holocaust site in the Czech Republic in July 2004 - and assailed the
United States for "reasserting its power in an arrogant way," the
conference report shows.
Among its suggestions for the place where the United States was
attacked and nearly 3,000 innocents massacred: "The Freedom Center
must signal its openness to contrary ideas."
Philip Kunhardt, the Freedom Center's editorial director, was in
attendance at a session called Bringing Conscience to Ground Zero and
was given this advice:
n "Help distinguish between American people and the U.S. government
in exhibits ..."
n "Use reports from human rights organizations to examine
contemporary abuse of rights."
n "Involve the United Nations, UNESCO and other international
bodies."
n "Use the museum as a venue for international meetings, where all
views are welcomed and considered."
At the conference, the coalition also leveled barbs at the IFC: "The
Freedom Center is a caricature of the typical American response to
everything [telling every story from an American viewpoint]."
Members of the coalition also expressed these concerns:
n "It seems that whatever Americans want, Americans get!" the
conference report states. "Is the definition of the 'struggle for
freedom' simply defined by the victors, or also by those engaged in
ongoing struggles? Will Americans really create a balanced vision of
freedom?"
n "The WTC was attacked because it was a symbol of power and
influence. In building the Freedom Tower, the U.S. reasserts its
power in an arrogant way: Does this mean the U.S. will not only build
the biggest building, but also define freedom for the world?"
n "Many nonsecular Muslims may be very skeptical about the intent of
this museum (e.g. the average Bangladeshi condemns the Sept. 11
attacks, yet at the same time feels his/her human rights have been
violated by the U.S.)."
Kunhardt, an ordained Episcopal minister and the writer of the PBS
series "Freedom: A History of Us," mostly listened. He agreed with
some things that were said, disagreeing with others, an observer
said. He didn't return calls.
Tofel said preliminary plans call for an exchange of exhibits with
some coalition museums.
"It is hoped and expected that temporary exhibits at the IFC will
originate at, or travel to, some of the Historic Site Museums of
Conscience - and perhaps vice versa," he said in an E-mail.
Originally published on August 21, 2005
